![]() Florida’s ban includes restrictions that make it difficult, if not impossible, for many transgender adults to get care. A handful of states also enacted laws prohibiting educators from referring to students by the names or pronouns they use without parental approval- measures that critics say would out transgender youth to their parents without their consent.Īdvocates said they’re worried about the push for restrictions going further, including proposals to limit access to gender-affirming care for adults as well as children. The medical bans are being challenged after a year where other restrictions on transgender people’s rights have advanced.Īt least 10 state have adopted laws barring transgender people from using restrooms that aren’t consistent with their sex assigned at birth, and at least 20 states have enacted restrictions on transgender athletes. “We’ve seen this with other issues where early on you have different courts ruling different ways, but I think ultimately there’s clear precedent about the authority of states to regulate the medical profession and to do so in a way that protects minors when there’s uncertainty and unknown harms,” said Matt Sharp, senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, one of the conservative groups pushing for the restrictions. Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld a temporary order Moody issued earlier against the ban. Arkansas’ attorney general has said he plans to appeal Moody’s decision to the 8th U.S. ![]() Proponents of the bans said they’re not worried about the Arkansas decision, saying it’s an early ruling in what’s expected to be a long legal fight over the restrictions. In both rulings, the judge has said that “gender identity is real.” The same federal judge this week also struck down Florida’s rule denying Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming care. ![]() The judge who blocked Florida from enforcing its ban on three children who sued was appointed by President Bill Clinton. Moody was appointed by President Barack Obama, and bans have been temporarily blocked by federal judges in Alabama and Indiana who were appointed by President Donald Trump. “There are two big problems with these laws: One is that they don’t necessarily survive constitutional scrutiny and the other is that they are based on very bad science,” said Elana Redfield, federal policy director for the Williams Institute at the the UCLA School of Law.Īdvocates said they’re also encouraged that the rulings so far on the medical bans have come from judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |